PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BANGUN RUANG DI SMP DENGAN PENDEKATAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK INDONESIA

Imas Maesaroh; Ika Yunitasari

doi:10.30653/004.202251.61

Imas Maesaroh Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar
Ika Yunitasari Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30653/004.202251.61

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to produce a new product of a learning device for building a Junior High School room with a valid, practical, and effective Indonesian realistic mathematics approach. In terms of the achievement of basic competencies, mathematical connection abilities, and interest in mathematics. This type of research is development using the ADDIE method which consists of five stages, namely the analysis, design, development, implementation, and ecaluation stages. The results of this research are in the form of lesson plans, worksheets, and learning outcomes test in the form of basic competency achievement tests (TTKD) and mathematical connection ability tests (TKKM). The validity and practicality of the device reached the very good category in terms of expert assessment, teacher assessment, student assessment, and observation of learning implementatiton. Aspects of effectivieness that must be met from the achievement of at least 75% of these students pass the KKM when viewed from the achievement of basic competencies and mathematical connection abilities, if students are more than 75% then these students have a good interest category in mathematics.

References

Azwar, S. 2009. Tes prestasi. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar.
Cowan, P. (2006). Teaching mathematics: A handbook for primary and secondary school teachers. New York: Routledge.
Danubroto, S. W. (2007). Pengaruh pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan Pendidikan matematika realistik indonesia dan pelatihan metakognitif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa sekolah dasar. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Elliot, S. N., Kratochwill, R. T., Cook, L. J., et.al. (2000). Educational psychology: effective teaching, effective learning. New York: The Mc Graw-Hill Companies.
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying realistic mathematics education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, University of Twente, Netherlands.
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Watt, H. M. G., et.al. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537. Retrive from:http://users.monash. edu.au/~hwatt/articles/Frenzel_etal_JRA2 010.pdf. [20 Januari 2014].
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.
Hadi, S. (2005). Pendidikan matematika realistik dan implementasinya. Banjarmasin: Tulip.
Jihad, A. 2008. Pengembangan kurikulum matematika (tinjauan teoritis dan historis). Bandung: Multi pressindo.
Kemp, J. E. Morrion, G. R. & Ross, S. M. (1994). Design effective instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Kennedy, L. M., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics (11th ed.). New York: Thomson Wadsworth.
Mendiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Mendiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 41 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Mitchell, M. & Gilson, J. (1997). Interest and anxiety in mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412116)
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standarts for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assesment of student (6th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Nugraheni, E., & Sugiman, S. (2013). Pengaruh pendekatan PMRI terhadap aktivitas dan pemahaman konsep matematika siswa SMP. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 101–108. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v8i1.84 98
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD.
Pramudiani, P. et al. (2011). A Concrete Situation for Learning Decimals. IndoMS Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 215-230.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. L. & Meece, J. L. (2010). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications. London: Pearson Education Internasional.
Sembiring, R. K. (2010). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI): Perkembangan dan tantangannya. IndoMS Journal Of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 11-16.
Sugiman & Kusumah, Y. S. (2010). Dampak pendidikan matematika realistik terhadap peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa SMP. IndoMS Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 41-45.
Thiagarajan S., Semmel D., & Semmel M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children : a sourcebook. Minneapolis, MA: Central for Innovation on Teaching the Handicaped.
Wardhani, S & Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika.
Westwood, P. (2008). Learning and learning difficulties: A handbook for teacher. Camberwell, VA: Acer Press.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Zaini, A., & Marsigit, M. (2014). Perbandingan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan pendekatan matematika realistik dan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan penalaran dan komunikasi matematik siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 152-163. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2. 2672
Zulkardi. (2002). Developing a learning environmenton realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers. Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, University of Twente, Netherlands.